I want to preface this account by saying it’s just that, an account: that time I went to Pittsburgh and protested the G20. This writing is my way of thinking through my experience and hoping to come to a better understanding of what happened there, and its implications for my life in the bigger scheme of things. I want to publish these in day-by-day accounts to keep them manageable for me to write them, so my brain doesn’t explode. Also a general disclaimer is needed based on the sheer amount of information I was inundated with in Pittsburgh, and misinformation which trickled down from every direction – there’s probably a lot I’ve gotten wrong. Rachel has been kind enough to help my memory.
One of the things I wish to recognize up front is my own privilege. I am extremely lucky to have a job that pays me well enough to have the ability to fly (rather than hitch hike, as many from far away did). Not only am I lucky; my place and privilege in society is the result of the many social and cultural forces which have shaped me and my experience, and I only hope to use that privilege in a way that helps more than it harms, if nothing else.
Day 1
I land in Pittsburgh the night before the first protest is set to happen. I’m met by Rachel, my protest buddy, who has been organizing with the People’s Caravan (also here) for a few weeks, whom I adopt as my affinity group for the protests. In the car ride to where we’re staying she earnestly begins talking about what she’s learned on the trip to Pittsburgh: how to avoid arrest and various methods the police have used on mass mobilizations in the past (“less lethal” weapons like rubber bullets, sponge grenades, tasers; and tactics like “wedging,” “snatch squads” and “kettling”). Even two whole days before any delegates of the G20 are meant to land in the city it is immediately apparent that the police presence is ubiquitous. From an overlook view of the whole city we see they already have one of the main bridges to downtown blocked off. I quickly realize exactly how serious the situation is. Of course I had expectations before I left but with a deep gut-rush it becomes tangible, visceral.
The next day after getting coffee (with some debate – participating in a movement which opposes capitalism as-is, can we justify getting our coffee at Starbucks? We end up laughing at ourselves about it but feel guilty despite having few options) we head up to the tent city sponsored by Bail Out the People where most of the People’s Caravan crew stayed the night. A meeting of everyone staying there commences. There are many different kinds of groups and people – young old black white homeless etc. The meeting begins, again, with protocol as to the cops, even though the tent city is on a church’s private property and thus don’t need a permit, they are clearly looking for an excuse to raid and shut down everything they can. By the next day the Climate Camp has been disbanded – tents and belongings confiscated & any bystanders arrested – so this is a legitimate concern. As Rachel says, “I think the differences between those camps are a really awesome illustration of the shittiness of needing a permit at all, and how the system works to 1. benefit people with property, and 2. criminalizes people for less than criminal actions.” At the end of the meeting a Sharpie goes around so everyone can write the number of the ACLU on themselves. If arrested the cops will probably take everything in your pockets, so skin is the best canvas for the one number you’ll get to call.
The People’s Caravan’s mission for the day is to find more ideal housing than the tent city – about twenty more people are expected to be rolling into Pitt and there won’t be room. We split up into a few cars to tackle neighborhoods to go around knocking on doors of churches. The police have done an amazing smear campaign in the months leading up to the summit - our group is told time and time again that the police will come, that we’re dangerous folks of ill-repute, and so on. The cops have also been raiding the homes which housed activists in the weeks before. Eventually the Quakers agree to take half of us in and friends of group members take the second half.
We reconvene at the convergence space set up by ResistG20 and, I believe, partnered with other anarchist groups. I sit in on a legal training workshop and learn still more about what to expect from the police. Basically, anything you would think that applies to dealings with cops under normal circumstances (that cooperating will get you better treatment, for example) is no longer true in mass mobilizations. You get thrown into a pen with a mass of other people and held until they charge you or just let you go after the action is over, regardless of who you are and what you were doing. Whether to give them your real information or not depends upon what your goals are in jail – whether you’re looking to post bail and get out ASAP or to practice jail solidarity and organize prisoners to work together (the specific ends to the latter are less clear to me). One thing which was particularly interesting to me – being “de-arrested,” which emphasizes the importance of having an affinity group. If a person is snatched basically the whole group turns on the police, chanting “let them go!” and physically trying to suck them back into the crowd. I imagine it’s a pretty powerful experience.
After the legal workshop there is a Health and Safety for Activists workshop, run by two street medics. Some of it is common sense, but it is good to be reminded of the potential ramifications of fecal impaction on your ability to protest. There’s a lot of good information on combating tear gas (a bandana soaked in water and lime juice), staying hydrated, and the medical support and resources that have been set up for this particular mobilization.
After the workshop Seeds of Peace Collective provides us with delicious free food and we disperse so that the spokescouncil can take place and the details of the (unpermitted) march tomorrow can be hammered out. What happened next is hard to explain. Rachel and I went back to the boys’ house (two friends of mine plus their two roommates) where a heated argument ensues over the course of consuming a large jug of cheap wine. We weren’t trying to win any converts, and yet our inherent positioning (going out of our way to take a stand on something). From my perspective, three of these participants perceived us as threatening their comfortable position and worldview, their desire to maintain a status quo of poverty and pursuit pleasure through music. It was a hard conversation to have – I think Rachel and I came to the conclusion that these boys were not so different from us as they thought, but they continually put up barriers around themselves that said “I do what I do and you do what you do,” as if it was audacious of us to publicly express our opinions, or that we were somehow imposing ourselves on them by planning to do so. I think, for me, that it served as a reminder of a very common and popular mindset: willful apathy, willful ignorance; a determination to only be concerned with one’s self and immediate world. Ultimately I think this mindset is a self-insulating, protective position to take up – I suspect because generally the conclusion we’ve collectively come to is that we’re pretty well fucked on the whole.